THE NATIONAL VOICE OF THE PRIVATE INVESTIGATION & SECURITY INDUSTRY

 

 

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF INVESTIGATION & SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

 
                                         FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – March 23, 2005


DATA Breaches Require Targeted Response

 

Recent developments following breaches at data brokers and financial institutions have led to calls for immediate regulatory and legislative action.  Private investigators agree that regulatory and/or legislative mandates for timely notification of breaches are an appropriate response.   We support Senator Feinstein’s bill, S 115 “Notification of Risk to Personal Data Act''.  The recent disclosures have also led data providers to renew and upgrade their vetting of clients, including private investigators, who require the data.  The National Council of Investigation and Security Services (NCISS) agrees that data providers should do appropriate due diligence to assure that information is used only for legitimate purposes.

 

Legislative Responses Should be Focused

 

Investigators are extremely concerned that in the current atmosphere public officials will be pressured to create an overbroad regulatory scheme that will be harmful to the court system and commerce.  And ironically, some of the suggestions being made would be counterproductive to the goal of fighting identity theft and other frauds.  Statutory solutions should focus on securing personal data, not restricting its use by legitimate entities.

 

The National Council of Investigation and Security Services (NCISS) has learned from experience that the best of legislative and regulatory intentions can lead to harmful unintended consequences.  The 1996 amendments to the Fair Credit Reporting Act ultimately led to an unanticipated requirement that employees suspected of theft be notified when an employer retained third parties to investigate the theft.  It took years before Congress was able to remedy that error with passage of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA).

 

Privacy groups have been using the public’s legitimate concern over the recent breaches to push a far broader agenda.  Their suggestions would result in limiting the ability of businesses to verify the identity of customers, to conduct background checks, and collect debt.  If barriers are erected to prevent legitimate business from accessing identifying information about an individual, then the identity thieves will have an easier time.  If one can’t confirm a Social Security number or other unique identifier, then the ID thief will have an easier time claiming to be Bob Jones.

 

 

Page 1 of 2

 

BOARD  MEMBERS

 

President

Roy Bucklin

 

First Vice President

Brian P. McGuinness

 

Second Vice President

Almeda Dunn

 

Third Vice President

Al Cavasin

 

Secretary

Eugene Ferraro

 

Treasurer

Julius “Buddy” Bombet

 

Chairman of the Board

Neal Holmes, Jr

 

Region 1

Steve Kirby

Peter Psarouthakis

 

Region 2

James Carino

Jimmie Mesis

 

Region 3

Maria Vinson Landry

Lynette Revill

 

Region 4

Jon McDowall

Greg Twardowski

 

Region 5

Robert A. Heales

Tom George

 

Region 6

Francie Koehler

Ray Smothers

 

Members at Large

Bert Falbaum

Al Cross

 

 

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Carolyn S. Ward

7501 Sparrows Point Blvd.

Baltimore, MD 21219

800-445-8408

Fax:  410-388-9746

E-Mail NCISS@comcast.net

www.nciss.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Private Investigators Use Data for the Public Good

 

Private investigators use data from brokers to facilitate justice.  We use the data to locate witnesses, find heirs, locate lost children, obtain child support, and detect fraud.  Police authorities do not have adequate resources to solve ID theft cases, and many victims end up using private investigators.  If the services investigators use to solve these cases are restricted, we’ll not be able to serve clients as effectively and an additional burden will be placed on public authorities.  

 

Recent Legislation

 

Congress has not been idle in recent years with regard to identity theft and personal information.  FACTA, which includes many provisions affecting identity theft, was enacted only last Congress.  In addition, more severe penalties for ID theft were imposed with enactment of the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act.  The impact of these statutes is only now being felt.  Congress should gauge the success of these measures before acting to broadly limit access to information that is so essential to commerce.

 

-30-

 

 

 

Contact:        Bruce H. Hulme, Chairman

                       NCISS Investigations Legislative Committee

                                                            Tel & Fax: 1-914-767-0625

                                                            Email: specialinvestigations@worldnet.att.net

 

Page 2 of 2